4.3 Article

Fertilisation and larval development in an Antarctic bivalve, Laternula elliptica, under reduced pH and elevated temperatures

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 536, 期 -, 页码 187-201

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps11436

关键词

Ocean acidification; Early life history; D-larvae; Invertebrate; Abnormal development; Climate change; CO2; Antarctica; Fertilisation

资金

  1. VUW Grant [100241]
  2. Victoria Doctoral Scholarship Fund
  3. Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund [NIW1101]
  4. NIWA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated temperatures associated with ocean warming and acidification can influence development and, ultimately, success of larval molluscs. The effect of projected oceanic changes on fertilisation and larval development in an Antarctic bivalve, Laternula elliptica, was investigated through successive larval stages at ambient temperature and pH conditions (-1.6 degrees C and pH 7.98) and conditions representative of projections through to 2100 (-0.5 degrees C to + 0.4 degrees C and pH 7.80 to pH 7.65). Where significant effects were detected, increased temperature had a consistently positive influence on larval development, regardless of pH level, while effects of reduced pH varied with larval stage and incubation temperature. Fertilisation was high and largely independent of stressors, with no loss of gamete viability. Mortality was unaffected at all development stages under experimental conditions. Elevated temperatures reduced occurrences of abnormalities in D-larvae and accelerated larval development through late veliger and D-larval stages, with D-larvae occurring 5 d sooner at 0.4 degrees C compared to ambient temperature. Reduced pH did not affect occurrences of abnormalities in larvae, but it slowed the development of calcifying stages. More work is required to investigate the effects of developmental delays of the magnitude seen here in order to better determine the ecological relevance of these changes on longer term larval and juvenile success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据