4.3 Article

Interaction between plant genotype and the symbiosis with Epichloe fungal endophytes in seeds of red fescue (Festuca rubra)

期刊

CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE
卷 62, 期 11, 页码 1010-1016

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/CP11300

关键词

dehesas; grasslands; plant-endophyte symbiosis; seed germination; seed survival; symbiotic interaction

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AGL2008-01159AGR]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In diverse natural habitats of Europe, plants of Festuca rubra are commonly infected by the fungal endophyte Epichloe festucae. Under several circumstances, the association between the grass and the fungus has been shown to be mutualistic. Here, we conducted an experiment to study the differences in seed germination and mortality between infected (E+) and endophyte-free plants (E-) at different temperatures (12 and 25 degrees C) and water potentials (0 and -0.5MPa). Three half-sib lines of F. rubra, each composed of E+ and E-seeds, and derived from infected plants from semiarid grasslands were used. Although the endophyte effect depended on the incubation condition, germination percentage was significantly greater for E-(52%) than for E+ seeds (41%). Seed germination was more inhibited by the low water potential (75 v. 24% for -0.5 and 0.0MPa, respectively), than by the high temperature (64 v. 35% for 25 and 12 degrees C, respectively). However, mortality was highly dependent on the interaction between plant genotype and endophyte, and between temperature and water condition. It is remarkable that while highly dependent on the host genotype, there was a clear effect of endophyte increasing seed survival, especially in those treatments that were unfavourable for germination. For example, in the more restrictive treatment (25 degrees C and -0.5MPa), seed survival was on average, 44 and 39% for E+ and E-, respectively. In general, the endophyte affected seed characteristics of F. rubra by reducing the percentage of germination, but simultaneously increasing seed survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据