4.1 Article

Classification of hemopericardium on postmortem CT

期刊

LEGAL MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 376-380

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.05.004

关键词

Postmortem CT; Pericardium; Cardiac tamponade; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Forensic radiology

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI, Japan [25461836]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25461836] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Postmortem CT (PMCT) is increasingly used in forensic practice, and knowledge and classification of typical hemopericardium on PMCT would help to assure correct radiological interpretation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the pericardial and pleural space fluid volumetry, and to evaluate the signs on PMCT pointing to cardiac tamponade as the cause of death, and their pitfalls. Fourteen cadavers (eleven male, three female, 49-87 [mean, 70.9] years) were examined by PMCT. The pericardial volume and pericardial findings with/without pleural space fluid collection were compared with autopsy findings. In addition, the appearance of pericardial lesions on PMCT was documented and compared with the autopsy findings. The respective volumes of pericardial space, and right and left pleural space fluid showed as 172.0711.0 (mean 368.7) ml, 0-1830.0 (266.1) ml, 0-231.0 (75.2) ml on PMCT, and were 136.0-652.0 (311.1) ml, 0-2100(299.0) ml, and 0-300.0(61.3) ml on autopsy. In statistical evaluation, the pericardial space volume was significantly greater on PMCT (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in pleural space fluid volume. The hemopericardium PMCT showed 3 patterns: double band, single band, and horizontal level, and the former two patterns presented as coagulated blood at autopsy. Single band and horizontal level patterns were thought to result from CPR-related causes and/or postmortem manipulation. In conclusion, double and single band patterns on PMCT were indicative findings of cardiac tamponade. An understanding of the pericardial PMCT appearance and its significance can help to avoid misreading, and is important for making correct radiological interpretation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据