4.6 Article

Sentic Album: Content-, Concept-, and Context-Based Online Personal Photo Management System

期刊

COGNITIVE COMPUTATION
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 477-496

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12559-012-9145-4

关键词

Human computer interaction; Cognitive and affective information processing; Image affect; Image classification; Image features; Emotional semantic image retrieval; Sentic computing

资金

  1. Hewlett-Packard Labs India
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/G501750/1]
  3. Sitekit Solutions Ltd. (UK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The world of online personal photo management has come a long way in the past few years, but today, there are still huge gaps in annotating, organizing, and retrieving online pictures in such a way that they can be easily queried and visualized. Existing content-based image retrieval systems apply statistics, pattern recognition, signal processing, and computer vision techniques but these are still too weak to 'bridge the semantic gap' between the low-level data representation and the high-level concepts the user associates with images. Image meta search engines, on the other hand, rely on tags associated with online pictures but results are often too inaccurate since they mainly depend on keyword-based rather than concept-based algorithms. Sentic Album is a novel content-, concept-, and context-based online personal photo management system that exploits both data and metadata of online personal pictures to intelligently annotate, organize, and retrieve them. Many salient features of pictures, in fact, are only noticeable in the viewer's mind, and the cognitive ability to grasp such features is a key aspect for accordingly analyzing and classifying personal photos. To this end, Sentic Album exploits not just colors and texture of online images (content), but also the cognitive and affective information associated with their metadata (concept), and their relative timestamp, geolocation, and user interaction metadata (context).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据