4.1 Editorial Material

Distinct glycosyltransferases synthesize E-selectin ligands in human vs. mouse leukocytes

期刊

CELL ADHESION & MIGRATION
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 288-292

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/cam.24714

关键词

leukocyte; endothelial cell; inflammation; carbohydrate; selectin; cell adhesion; fluid shear; sialyl Lewis-X; glycosyltransferase; fucosyltransferase

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL103411, HL103411, HL63014, R01 HL063014] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The binding of selectins to carbohydrate epitopes expressed on leukocytes is the first step in a multi-step cell adhesion cascade that controls the rate of leukocyte recruitment at sites of inflammation. The glycans that function as selectin-ligands are post-translationally synthesized by the serial action of Golgi resident enzymes called glycosyltransferases (glycoTs). Whereas much of our current knowledge regarding the role of glycoTs in constructing selectin-ligands comes from reconstituted biochemical investigations or murine models, tools to assess the impact of these enzymes on the human ligands are relatively underdeveloped. This is significant since the selectin-ligands, particularly those that bind E-selectin, vary between different leukocyte cell populations and they are also different in humans compared with mice. To address this shortcoming, a recent study by Buffone et al. (2013) outlines a systematic strategy to knockdown upto three glycoTs simultaneously in human leukocytes. The results suggest that the fucosyltransferases (FUTs) regulating selectin-ligand synthesis may be species-specific. In particular, they demonstrate that FUT9 plays a significant role during human, but not mouse, leukocyte-endothelial interactions. Overall, this article discusses the relative roles of the FUTs during human L-, E-, and P-selectin-ligand biosynthesis, and the potential that the knockdown strategy outlined here may assess the role of other glycoTs in human leukocytes also.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据