4.6 Article

Performance and characterization of rhenium-modified Rh-Ir alloy catalyst for one-pot conversion of furfural into 1,5-pentanediol

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 2535-2549

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cy00161c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan through it's Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers
  2. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One-pot selective conversion of highly concentrated furfural to 1,5-pentanediol (1,5-PeD) was carried out over Rh-added Ir-ReOx/SiO2 catalysts through two-step reaction temperatures. Over the optimized catalyst, Rh(0.66 wt%)-Ir-ReOx/SiO2, the maximum yield of 1,5-PeD was 71.1% from highly concentrated furfural (50 wt%) and 78.2% from diluted furfural (10 wt%). These values were higher than those obtained with Ir-ReOx/SiO2 or Pd-Ir-ReOx/SiO2 catalysts. Rh-Ir-ReOx/SiO2 showed much higher activity in the hydrogenation of furfural to tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol intermediate in the low temperature step than Ir-ReOx/SiO2, although the hydrogenation activity was lower than that of Pd-Ir-ReOx/SiO2. A long reaction time in the low temperature step is necessary to obtain a good 1,5-PeD yield over Rh-Ir-ReOx/SiO2 in two-step reaction of furfural. The hydrogenolysis activity of Rh-Ir-ReOx/SiO2 for tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol to 1,5-PeD in the high temperature step was higher than that of Pd-Ir-ReOx/SiO2 and was comparable to that of Ir-ReOx/SiO2. The characterization results of TPR, XRD, XANES, EXAFS, STEM-EDX and FT-IR of adsorbed CO indicated that Rh-Ir-ReOx/SiO2 catalysts showed the structure of Ir-Rh alloy particles partially covered with ReOx species. The hydrogenation activity of Rh-Ir-ReOx/SiO2 for the furan ring was higher than those of the mixture of Rh-Ir/SiO2 and Ir-ReOx/SiO2 or the mixture of Rh-ReOx/SiO2 and Ir-ReOx/SiO2. Both Ir-Rh alloy formation and ReOx modification of alloy particles are essential for the high hydrogenation activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据