4.6 Article

Cu-grafted mesoporous organic polymer: a new recyclable nanocatalyst for multi-component, N-arylation and S-arylation reactions

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 3, 期 12, 页码 3303-3316

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3cy00600j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST)
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) New Delhi, India
  3. Department of Chemistry, University of Kalyani under PURSE, FIST
  4. SAP programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new mesoporous Cu-MPTA-1 nanocatalyst has been synthesized via a simple and facile in situ radical polymerization of triallylamine in the presence of an organic-organic self-assembly of anionic surfactant SDS, followed by grafting of Cu(II) at room temperature under an inert atmosphere. This nanomaterial has been characterized by elemental analysis, powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), N-2 adsorption-desorption studies, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and EPR spectroscopy. Cu-MPTA-1 acts as an efficient heterogeneous nanocatalyst exhibiting a high catalytic activity for N-arylation and S-arylation reactions using water as a green solvent and also exhibits an excellent catalytic activity for the one-pot synthesis of propargylamines via a three component coupling of an alkyne, an amine and an aldehyde at room temperature. Moreover, the catalyst is easily recoverable and can be reused six times without an appreciable loss of catalytic activity in the three component coupling reaction. The highly dispersed Cu(II) sites in the Cu-grafted mesoporous polymer could be responsible for the observed high activities of the Cu-MPTA-1 catalyst in the coupling reactions. No evidence of leached Cu from the catalyst during the course of the reaction has been observed, suggesting true heterogeneity in the catalytic process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据