4.7 Article

Integrative Genomic Characterization of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Identifies Frequent Somatic Drivers

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 770-781

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0537

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [RP100233]
  2. NIH/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research [RC2DE020958]
  3. NIH Specialized Program of Research Excellence [P50CA097007]
  4. Cancer Center Support Grant [P30CA0CA16672]
  5. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  6. Pantheon Program
  7. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The survival of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has not changed significantly in several decades, leading clinicians and investigators to search for promising molecular targets. To this end, we conducted comprehensive genomic analysis of gene expression, copy number, methylation, and point mutations in OSCC. Integrated analysis revealed more somatic events than previously reported, identifying four major driver pathways (mitogenic signaling, Notch, cell cycle, and TP53) and two additional key genes (FAT1, CASP8). The Notch pathway was defective in 66% of patients, and in follow-up studies of mechanism, functional NOTCH1 signaling inhibited proliferation of OSCC cell lines. Frequent mutation of caspase-8 (CASP8) defines a new molecular subtype of OSCC with few copy number changes. Although genomic alterations are dominated by loss of tumor suppressor genes, 80% of patients harbored at least one genomic alteration in a targetable gene, suggesting that novel approaches to treatment may be possible for this debilitating subset of head and neck cancers. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first integrated genomic analysis of OSCC. Only through integrated multiplatform analysis was it possible to identify four key pathways. We also discovered a new disease subtype associated with CASP8 and HRAS mutation. Finally, many candidate targetable events were found and provide hope for future genomically driven therapeutic strategies. (C) 2013 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据