4.7 Article

A Novel Two-Stage, Transdisciplinary Study Identifies Digoxin as a Possible Drug for Prostate Cancer Treatment

期刊

CANCER DISCOVERY
卷 1, 期 1, 页码 68-77

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8274.CD-10-0020

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services [P50 CA58236]
  2. Johns Hopkins University
  3. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA55075, R01 CA133891]
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services (Harvard University) [R01 HL35464]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of novel indications for commonly prescribed drugs could accelerate translation of therapies. We investigated whether any clinically used drugs might be useful in treating prostate cancer by coupling an efficient, high-throughput laboratory-based screen and a large prospective cohort study. In stage one, we conducted an in vitro prostate cancer cell cytotoxicity screen of 3,187 compounds. Digoxin emerged as the leading candidate, given its potency in inhibiting proliferation in vitro (the concentration of the drug at which proliferation was inhibited by 50%: mean of 163 nM) and its common use. In stage two, we evaluated the association between the leading candidate drug from stage one and prostate cancer risk in 47,884 men followed up from 1986 through 2006. Regular digoxin users [vs nonusers: relative risk (RR) = 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.95], especially users for >= 10 years (RR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.79; P trend < 0.001), had a lower prostate cancer risk. Digoxin was highly potent in inhibiting prostate cancer cell growth in vitro, and its use was associated with a 25% lower prostate cancer risk. SIGNIFICANCE: Our two-stage transdisciplinary approach for drug repositioning provides compelling justification for further mechanistic and possibly clinical testing of the leading nonchemotherapy candidate, digoxin, a cardiac glycoside, as a drug for prostate cancer treatment. Perhaps of equal importance, our study illustrates the power of the transdisciplinary approach in translational cancer research. By coupling laboratory and epidemiologic methods and thinking, we reduced the probability of identifying false-positive candidate drugs for the next steps in testing. Cancer Discovery; 1(1); 68-77. (C) 2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据