4.4 Article

Analysis of operative efficacy for giant pituitary adenoma

期刊

BMC SURGERY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-59

关键词

Giant pituitary adenoma; MR imaging; Tumor volume; Microsurgery; Transsphenoidal surgery; Operative efficacy; Resection rate

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Surgical treatment of giant pituitary adenomas is difficult due to complicated dissection of the sellar area. The extent of tumor resection affects the efficacy of surgical treatment. This study is to investigate the efficacy of microsurgical treatment for giant pituitary adenoma and to analyze the relationship between treatment efficacy and tumor resection extent. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 36 patients who received microsurgery to remove giant pituitary adenomas. The sizes of tumors before and after surgery were calculated with a novel method called the platform-like volume calculation formula. The relationships between extent of resection and the visual impairment recovery, and improvement of serum hormone level before and after operation were analyzed. Results: Two deaths were observed after surgery. And the gross and near-total resection was achieved in 8 cases, subtotal resection in 8 cases, mostly partial resection in 15 cases, and partial resection in 5 cases. The average resection rate was 72.8%. The resection rate of tumor with cavernous sinus invasion was significantly lower than those of patients without cavernous sinus invasion (P < 0.05). The improvement rate of hormone level in functional adenoma was 80.0%. Follow-up observations were carried out for 3 similar to 28 months in 25 cases. Visual improvement was observed in 64.0% of the cases. Conclusions: Microsurgical treatment can improve the visual impairment of the majority of cases and significantly decrease the serum hormone levels of functional adenoma. The extent of resection was significantly associated with cavernous sinus invasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据