3.9 Article

Intraocular and Intracranial Pressures During Head-Down Tilt with Lower Body Negative Pressure

期刊

出版社

AEROSPACE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3357/AMHP.4044.2015

关键词

lower body negative pressure; intraocular pressure; intracranial pressure; vision impairment; spaceflight

资金

  1. National Space Biomedical Research Institute [NCC 9-58]
  2. NASA [NNX13AJ12G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Seven astronauts after 6-mo missions to the International Space Station showed unexpected vision problems. Lumbar punctures performed in the four astronauts with optic disc edema showed moderate elevations of cerebral spinal fluid pressure after returning to Earth. We hypothesized that lower body negative pressure (LBNP) imposed during head-down tilt (HDT) would reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) and transcranial ultrasound pulse amplitude, a noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) surrogate. METHODS: Participating in this study were 25 normal healthy nonsmoking volunteers (mean age: 36 yr). Subjects were positioned supine (5 min), sitting (5 min), 15 degrees whole body HDT (5 min), and 10 min of HDT with LBNP (25 mmHg). The order of HDT and HDT+LBNP tests was balanced. Right and left IOP, transcranial ultrasound pulse amplitude, arm blood pressure, and heart rate were measured during the last minute (steady state) of each testing condition. RESULTS: IOP significantly decreased from supine to sitting posture by 3.2 +/- 1.4 mmHg (mean +/- SD:N = 25), and increased by 0.9 +/- 1.3 mmHg from supine to the HDT position. LBNP during HDT significantly lowered IOP to supine levels. In addition, LBNP significantly reduced transcranial ultrasound pulse amplitudes by 38% as compared to the HDT condition (N 5 9). Sitting mean blood pressure (BP) was signifi cantly higher (+5 mmHg) than BP values after 10 min of LBNP during HDT. However, heart rate was not signifi cantly different across all conditions. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that short duration exposures to LBNP attenuate HDT-induced increases in IOP and ICP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据