4.5 Article

Reduced TET2 function leads to T-cell lymphoma with follicular helper T-cell-like features in mice

期刊

BLOOD CANCER JOURNAL
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2014.83

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT) [22130002, 24390241, 25112703, 25670444, 25461407, 26860717]
  2. Sagawa Cancer Foundation
  3. Naito Foundation
  4. Mochida Memorial Foundation
  5. Kato Memorial Bioscience Foundation
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of the Science Research Fellowship [23-1028]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25670444, 24390241, 22130002, 26860717, 25461407, 25112703] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TET2 (Ten Eleven Translocation 2) is a dioxygenase that converts methylcytosine (mC) to hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC). TET2 loss-of- function mutations are highly frequent in subtypes of T-cell lymphoma that harbor follicular helper T (Tfh)-cell-like features, such as angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (30-83%) or peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (10-49%), as well as myeloid malignancies. Here, we show that middle-aged Tet2 knockdown (Tet2(gt/gt)) mice exhibit Tfh-like cell overproduction in the spleen compared with control mice. The Tet2 knockdown mice eventually develop T-cell lymphoma with Tfh-like features after a long latency (median 67 weeks). Transcriptome analysis revealed that these lymphoma cells had Tfh-like gene expression patterns when compared with splenic CD4-positive cells of wild-type mice. The lymphoma cells showed lower hmC densities around the transcription start site (TSS) and higher mC densities at the regions of the TSS, gene body and CpG islands. These epigenetic changes, seen in Tet2 insufficiency-triggered lymphoma, possibly contributed to predated outgrowth of Tfh-like cells and subsequent lymphomagenesis. The mouse model described here suggests that TET2 mutations play a major role in the development of T-cell lymphoma with Tfh-like features in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据