4.6 Article

Imaging and modeling collagen architecture from the nano to micro scale

期刊

BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 233-243

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/BOE.5.000233

关键词

-

资金

  1. Arthritis Research UK [20299]
  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Unit into Musculoskeletal Disease
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Canadian Institute for Photonic Innovations
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  6. Mprime NCE Strategic Postdoctoral Research Program
  7. Ministere du Developpement economique, Innovation et Exportation
  8. Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Nature et technologies
  9. Cancer Research UK
  10. Versus Arthritis [18887] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10216] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Orthopaedic Research UK [458] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Versus Arthritis [20299] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The collagen meshwork plays a central role in the functioning of a range of tissues including cartilage, tendon, arteries, skin, bone and ligament. Because of its importance in function, it is of considerable interest for studying development, disease and regeneration processes. Here, we have used second harmonic generation (SHG) to image human tissues on the hundreds of micron scale, and developed a numerical model to quantitatively interpret the images in terms of the underlying collagen structure on the tens to hundreds of nanometer scale. Focusing on osteoarthritic changes in cartilage, we have demonstrated that this combination of polarized SHG imaging and numerical modeling can estimate fibril diameter, filling fraction, orientation and bundling. This extends SHG microscopy from a qualitative to quantitative imaging technique, providing a label-free and non-destructive platform for characterizing the extracellular matrix that can expand our understanding of the structural mechanisms in disease. (C) 2013 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据