4.4 Article

Bedside nurse-patient interactions do not reliably detect delirium: An observational study

期刊

AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 126-132

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2011.01.002

关键词

Delirium; Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit; Nurses recognition of delirium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Delirium is an acute, reversible and fluctuating central nervous system dysfunction with an organic cause, and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Many recent studies have shown that delirium is highly prevalent in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) population. Despite its seriousness; delirium in the ICU is under recognized by bedside nurses. Objective: To determine if routine bedside nurse-patient interactions enable the detection of delirium. Method: We performed a single center observational study, in a 12 bed general Intensive Care Unit. Bedside nurses were asked to assess patients for delirium during routine patient care throughout their shift. This assessment was then compared to an independent assessment using the Confusion Assessment Method - ICU (CAM-ICU) performed by a nurse trained in this delirium detection tool. Results: We analysed the results of 35 matched assessments performed on 35 patients. The presence of delirium was identified by the bedside nurse in 27% of CAM-ICU delirium positive assessments, whereas the absence of delirium was identified by the bedside nurse in 92% of CAM-ICU delirium negative assessments. Conclusion: There was a significant discrepancy between the ICU bedside nurses' assessment of delirium and the independent formal delirium assessment utilizing the CAM-ICU. We concluded that routine bedside nursing patient interaction do not reliably detect delirium in a critically ill patient. (C) 2011 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Australia (a division of Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据