4.2 Article

Effect of AAC partner training using video on peers' interpretation of the behaviors of presymbolic middle-schoolers with multiple disabilities

期刊

AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 301-310

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1508306

关键词

Communication partner intervention; peer training; multiple disabilities; presymbolic communication; video visual scene display

资金

  1. Hintz Family Endowed Chair for Children's Communicative Competence
  2. National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) [90RE5017]
  3. U.S. Department of Education [H325D110008, H325D170024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Children require consistent responses from partners to their presymbolic behaviors in order to increase the frequency and variety of these behaviors and eventually build symbolic language. This study served as an initial attempt to evaluate the effect of AAC training on typically-developing peers' interpretation of the behavior of three students with multiple disabilities whose communication was presymbolic and idiosyncratic in nature. The study used a pretest-posttest control group design with 12 peers in each condition (i.e., experimental and control). During the pretest, peers in both groups were inaccurate in their interpretations of the behaviors of the students with multiple disabilities. During the posttest, peers who completed the training interpreted the behaviors of the students with multiple disabilities with statistically significantly higher accuracy than participants who did not complete the training. The training may be an effective intervention approach to increase the accuracy and consistency with which communication partners interpret the idiosyncratic behaviors of children with multiple disabilities. Future research should evaluate the efficacy of using such training to increase communication partners' identification of and responsivity to idiosyncratic behaviors within the context of real-world interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据