4.6 Article

Ionic liquid assisted growth of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/reduced graphene oxide based electrode: An improved electro-catalytic performance for the detection of organophosphorus pesticides in beverages

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 1121-1133

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.08.008

关键词

PEDOT/ILRGO electrodes; Impedimetry; Electrocatalysis; Voltammetry; Pesticides

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology-Science and Engineering Research Board [SERB/F/0635]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An enzyme based nanocomposite host matrix comprising of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethanesulfonate based ionic liquid functionalized reduced graphene oxide (PEDOT/ILRGO) has been designed for the electrochemical detection of organophosphorus pesticides (OPs). Interactions between reduced graphene oxide and ionic liquid have resulted in better loading of the same onto the PEDOT matrix. A detail redox analysis highlights the increased surface area and more number of charge carriers enabling the redox inhibition mechanism more efficient in the designed electrode. The biosensor works on the principle of generation of thiocholine by reaction between acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and substrate acethylthiocholine iodide (ATChI), which undergoes oxidation resulting in redox peaks. Under the optimized conditions, three different OPs chlorpyrifos (CP), malathion (ML) and methyl parathion (MP) were analyzed by varying concentrations with limit of detection calculated to be 0.04 ng ml(-1), 0.117 ng ml(-1) and 0.108 ng ml(-1) respectively, all below 0.2 mu g ml(-1) concentration which is their maximum residual limit, hence exhibiting good sensitivity. The prepared sensor offers 91.7% of reactivation and good stability for 15-20 days with 95.7% of initial current response retainment, reflecting its excellent potency as an organophosphorus pesticide sensor. (C) 2018 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据