4.6 Article

Copper removal from aqueous solution using biochar: Effect of chemical activation

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 43-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.08.001

关键词

Brewers draff; Pyrolysis; Chemical activation; Sorption; Column retention

资金

  1. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [COST CZ LD13068]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [GACR P503/11/0840]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main aim of this study was to test the efficiency of biochar for Cu removal from synthetic and soil solutions, respectively. The biochar was produced from brewers draff via pyrolysis. Additionally, the prepared biochar was also activated using 2 M KOH to enhance its sorption efficiency to remove Cu from both solutions. Two different aqueous solutions were prepared for these experiments: (i) a synthetic using Cunitrate salt with 0.01 M NaNO3 and (ii) soil solution obtained from a Cu-contaminated soil using 0.01 M CaCl2 leaching procedure. Batch sorption and column experiments were used to evaluate the efficiency of both biochar (BC) and activated biochar (BCact) to remove Cu from the solutions. Results showed that both biochar samples are pure amorphous carbon and the Cu sorption is thus mainly a result of physical sorption on the biochar surface. Next, chemical activation, using 2 M KOH, significantly increased the total volume of all pores in biochar (from 0.01 +/- 0.002 to 8.74 +/- 0.18 mL g(-1)). On the other hand, the BET surface area was similar for both sorbents (BC = 9.80 +/- 0.62 m(2) g(-1) and BCact = 11.6 +/- 0.4 m(2) g(-1)). Results also demonstrate enhanced sorption efficiency of the BCact (10.3 mg g(-1)) in comparison with the BC (8.77 mg g(-1)). Additionally, enhanced Cu removal during column retention test was observed for the BCact in both synthetic and soil solutions, respectively. In summary, the results showed that biochar prepared from brewers draff was able to remove Cu from both aqueous solutions. (C) 2013 Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of King Saud University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据