4.3 Article

Oceanic mechanical forcing of a marine-terminating Greenland glacier

期刊

ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 53, 期 60, 页码 181-192

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3189/2012AoG60A083

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA Graduate Earth and Space Science Fellowship
  2. University of California Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Geophysics Mini-Grant
  3. UCSC Committee on Research
  4. NASA grant [NNX08AD31G-05]
  5. GPS
  6. GPS, time-lapse camera equipment and partial field logistics
  7. OSU Climate Water Carbon Initiative grant
  8. US National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamics of marine-terminating major outlet glaciers are of high interest because of their potential for drawing down large areas of the Greenland ice sheet. We quantify short-term changes in ice flow speed and calving at a major West Greenland glacier and examine their relationship to the presence of the sea-ice melange and tidal stage. A field campaign at the terminus of Store Gletscher (70.40 degrees N, 50.55 degrees W) spanning the spring and summer of 2008 included four broadband seismometers, three time-lapse cameras, a tide gauge, an automatic weather station and an on-ice continuous GPS station. Sub-daily fluctuations in speed coincide with two modes of oceanic forcing: (1) the removal of the ice melange from the terminus front and (2) tidal fluctuations contributing to speed increases following ice melange removal. Tidal fluctuations in ice flow speed were observed 16 km from the terminus and possibly extend further. Seismic records suggest that periods of intensive calving activity coincide with ice-flow acceleration following breakup of the melange in spring. A synchronous increase in speed at the front and clearing of the melange suggests that the melange directly resists ice flow. We estimate a buttressing stress (similar to 30-60 kPa) due to the presence of the ice melange that is greater than expected from the range of observed tides, though an order of magnitude less than the driving stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据