4.3 Article

Tropical forcing of Circumpolar Deep Water Inflow and outlet glacier thinning in the Amundsen Sea Embayment, West Antarctica

期刊

ANNALS OF GLACIOLOGY
卷 53, 期 60, 页码 19-28

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3189/2012AoG60A110

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Centre for International Cooperation in Higher Education
  2. University of Washington
  3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  4. NASA
  5. US Department of Energy
  6. US National Science Foundation [OPP-0837988]
  7. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G001367/1]
  8. University of Washington's Quaternary Research Center
  9. Natural Environment Research Council [bas0100033, bas0100028, NE/G001367/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [0837988] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. NERC [NE/G001367/1, bas0100033, bas0100028] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Outlet glaciers draining the Antarctic ice sheet into the Amundsen Sea Embayment (ASE) have accelerated in recent decades, most likely as a result of increased melting of their ice-shelf termini by warm Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW). An ocean model forced with climate reanalysis data shows that, beginning in the early 1990s, an increase in westerly wind stress near the continental shelf edge drove an increase in CDW inflow onto the shelf. The change in local wind stress occurred predominantly in fall and early winter, associated with anomalous high sea-level pressure (SIP) to the north of the ASE and an increase in sea surface temperature (SST) in the central tropical Pacific. The SLP change is associated with geopotential height anomalies in the middle and upper troposphere, characteristic of a stationary Rossby wave response to tropical SST forcing, rather than with changes in the zonally symmetric circulation. Tropical Pacific warming similar to that of the 1990s occurred in the 1940s, and thus is a candidate for initiating the current period of ASE glacier retreat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据