4.4 Article

Wind erosion of volcanic materials in the Hekla area, South Iceland

期刊

AEOLIAN RESEARCH
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 39-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.12.006

关键词

Volcanic materials; Aeolian transport; Iceland; Landscape; Sediment profile

资金

  1. Landsvirkjun Energy Research Fund
  2. Soil Conservation Service
  3. Agricultural University of Iceland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iceland has extensive areas with intense aeolian processes, in spite of humid climate. We measured wind erosion in a 110 km(2) heterogeneous sandy area near the Mt. Hekla volcano in South Iceland. The area is sparsely vegetated and covered by volcanic materials. Measurements were made during two summer seasons in 2008-2009 with dust traps at 25 locations employing a 'single dust trap method after characterizing sediment height profiles. Sets of electronic equipment that measured wind erosion and several weather parameters were placed at two locations. The results show a large variation in sediment transport with maximum transport in storms ranging from 0 to 1788 kg m(-1) at each site and maximum average transport during storm reaching 244 kg m(-1) h(-1). The aeolian transport each summer ranged from 1 to 2981 kg m(-1). Amount of loose sandy sediments on the surface, sediment texture and proximity to water channels are important factors explaining site differences. Wind erosion was most intense in the north-eastern part of the area, with >80% loose sand on the surface but less intense closest to the volcano where coarse pumice characterizes the surface. The research shows a pathway of sediment transport on a landscape scale with north-easterly winds, into the Thjorsa river, enhanced by landscape characteristics and seasonally active water channel. Pumice grains >8 mm in diameter were transported by saltation. Grains >1 mm were commonly >20% of materials collected at 30 cm height, which is explained by low density of the volcanic materials and high wind velocities. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据