4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Dust generation on a proglacial floodplain, West Greenland

期刊

AEOLIAN RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 43-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2011.01.002

关键词

Proglacial floodplain; Dust; Aeolian transport; Greenland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interplay of glacial dynamics, glaciofluvial and aeolian transport in proglacial landscapes plays an important role in local environmental systems and in the global context by affecting the amount of dust generated and transported at different phases of glacial-interglacial cycles. Glacial outwash plains are a significant source of dust, however the processes involved in dust generation on proglacial floodplains are poorly documented. We report a study of the quantity and characteristics of aeolian suspended sediment transport in Sandflugtdalen, a valley containing a proglacial floodplain and aeolian dunefield in West Greenland. Although the surface sediment of both the floodplain and dunefield contain a considerable amount of sand-sized material, wind speeds recorded were insufficiently strong to mobilise this material; this is probably due to the armouring effect of coarser particles in the surface deposits. Nevertheless, fine (dust-sized) aeolian sediments were transported down valley in suspension and the source of this material was a silt-dominated meltwater deposit up valley from the monitoring sites. Dust transport ranged from 0.0008 to 0.082 g m w s(-1) days and 0.0035-0.011 g m w s(-1) over a further 57 days during which no additional fluvial sediments were deposited. The reduction in sediment transport rate is attributed to both a depleted sediment supply and a decrease in above threshold winds. The supply of fine sediments to this proglacial region is dependent on meltwater suspended sediment loads which are predicted to increase during glacier retreat; reworking of the floodplain during ice retreat may also make more material available for aeolian transport. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据