4.8 Article

Extending the Service Life of High-Ni Layered Oxides by Tuning the Electrode-Electrolyte Interphase

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 29, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201801957

关键词

electrode-electrolyte interphase; high-nickel layered oxides; lithium bis(oxalate) borate; lithium-ion batteries; secondary-ion mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy through the Advanced Battery Materials Research (BMR) Program (Battery500 Consortium) [DE-EE0007762]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a high-energy-density cathode for Li-ion batteries, high-Ni layered oxides, especially with ultrahigh Ni-content, suffer from short lifespans, due in part to their unstable electrode-electrolyte interphase (EEI). Herein, the cycle life of LiNi0.94Co0.06O2 is greatly extended by manipulating the EEI with a lithium bis(oxalate) (LiBOB) additive even when operated at a moderately high voltage (4.4 V vs Li/Li+). Impressively, the capacity retention can be increased from 61 to 80% after 500 cycles in a full cell paired with a graphite anode. Additionally, the presence of LiBOB enables a robust boron- and oxygen-enriched EEI that effectively inhibits continual electrolyte decomposition and offers a stable cathode surface. Moreover, the layered architecture of the cathode-electrolyte interphase (CEI) and the anode-electrolyte interphase (AEI) at the nanometer scale is revealed by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. It is demonstrated that the cathode surface chemistry can significantly influence the AEI both chemically and physically, and AEI is modified from a thick three-layer to a thin two-layer architecture by tuning the cathode surface chemistry with LiBOB. This work presents a correlation between the EEI characteristics and battery performance and highlights the significance of manipulating surface chemistry in developing stable high-energy-density Li-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据