4.8 Article

Fused-Ring Nonfullerene Acceptor Forming Interpenetrating J-Architecture for Fullerene-Free Polymer Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 31, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201800204

关键词

fullerene-free; J-aggregate; nonfullerene acceptors; polymer solar cells; single crystals

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [91433202, 21773262, 21327805, 21521062, 91227112]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDB12010200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An interesting and important question emerges with the rapid advances of the highly efficient fused-ring nonfullerene acceptors; that is, how the acceptor molecules form aggregates in its blended film with a donor polymer/small molecule so as to offer highly efficient exciton diffusion and electron transport? To answer this question, a new acceptor molecule, 3,9-bis(5-methylene-4-one-6-(1,1-dicyanomethylene)-cyclopenta[c]thiophen-2,8-dimethyl)-5,5,11,11-tetrakis(4-n-hexylphenyl)-dithieno[2,3-d:2', 3'-d']-s-indaceno[1,2-b:5,6-b']dithiophene (ITCT-DM), is designed and synthesized herein and its unique interpenetrating J-architecture is presented in which the acceptor molecules form compacted and displaced pp-stacks with the distances of 3.1-4.2 angstrom. Again the crystal structure data are correlated with the grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) data of the pure acceptor and its polymer: acceptor blended films, which gives a clearer picture about the origins of the acceptor's GIXRD signals in both the pure and its blended films. Again, these results unveil the key roles of the uses of 1,8-diiodooctane (DIO) and thermal annealing treatment in optimizing the acceptor phase morphologies in the donor: acceptor blended film, and the combination of the thermal annealing and DIO treatment leads to obtain higher crystallinity for both the donor and acceptor phases, more compacted packing, and finer morphologies. A power conversion efficiency of 10.5% is obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据