4.8 Article

Correlating Structure and Morphology to Device Performance of Molecular Organic Donor-Acceptor Photovoltaic Cells Based on Diindenoperylene (DIP) and C60

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 1075-1083

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201201012

关键词

diindenoperylene; organic solar cells; GISAXS; thin film morphology

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SPP 1355, MU1487/13, BR1728/8]
  2. Elite Network of Bavaria within the International Graduate School Materials Science of Complex Interfaces'
  3. Bavarian Collaborative Research Project Solar Technologies Go Hybrid' (SolTec)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of organic photovoltaic cells (OPVCs) shows a critical dependence on morphology and structure of the active layers. In small molecule donor/acceptor (D/A) cells fabrication parameters, like substrate temperature and evaporation rate, play a significant role for crystallization and roughening of the film. In particular, the fraction of mixed material at the interface between donor and acceptor is highly relevant for device performance. While an ideal planar heterojunction (PHJ) exhibits the smallest possible interface area resulting in suppressed recombination losses, mixed layers suffer strongly from recombination but show higher exciton dissociation efficiencies. In this study we investigate PHJ and planar-mixed heterojunction (PM-HJ) solar cells based on diindenoperylene (DIP) as donor and C-60 as acceptor, fabricated under different growth conditions. Grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering (GISAXS), X-ray reflectometry (XRR) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) are used to obtain detailed information about in- and out-of-plane structures and topography. In that way we find that surface and bulk domain distances are correlated in size for PHJs, while PM-HJs show no correlation at all. The resulting solar cell characteristics are strongly affected by the morphology, as reorganizations in structure correlate with changes in the solar cell performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据