4.8 Article

Hierarchical Carbide-Derived Carbon Foams with Advanced Mesostructure as a Versatile Electrochemical Energy-Storage Material

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201300645

关键词

carbide-derived carbons; electrochemical double-layer capacitors; lithium-sulfur batteries; mesocellular siliceous foams; nanocasting

资金

  1. German ministry of Education and Science (BMBF)
  2. European Union (ERDF)
  3. Free State of Saxony (SAB) [100111670]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly porous carbide-derived carbon (CDC) mesofoams (DUT-70) are prepared by nanocasting of mesocellular silica foams with a polycarbosilane precursor. Ceramic conversion followed by silica removal and high-temperature chlorine treatment yields CDCs with a hierarchical micro-mesopore arrangement. This new type of polymer-based CDC is characterized by specific surface areas as high as 2700 m(2) g(-1), coupled withultrahigh micro- and mesopore volumes up to 2.6 cm(3) g(-1). The relationship between synthesis conditions and the properties of the resulting carbon materials is described in detail, allowing precise control of the properties of DUT-70. Since the hierarchical pore system ensures both efficient mass transfer and high capacities, the novel CDC shows outstanding performance as an electrode material in electrochemical double-layer capacitors (EDLCs) with specific capacities above 240 F g(-1) when measured in a symmetrical two-electrode configuration. Remarkable capacities of 175 F g(-1) can be retained even at high current densities of 20 A g(-1) as a result of the enhanced ion-transport pathways provided by the cellular mesostructure. Moreover, DUT-70 can be infiltrated with sulfur and host the active material in lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. Reversible capacities of 790 mAh g(-1) are achieved at a current rate of C/10 after 100 cycles, which renders DUT-70 an ideal support material for electrochemical energy-storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据