4.8 Article

The Electrochemical Flow Capacitor: A New Concept for Rapid Energy Storage and Recovery

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 7, 页码 895-902

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201100768

关键词

supercapacitors; electrochemical energy storage; grid energy storage; flow cells

资金

  1. Fluid Interface Reactions, Structures and Transport (FIRST) Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [ERKCC61]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  4. US National Science Foundation Integrated Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) in Nanoscale Science and Engineering [DGE-0654313]
  5. NSF REU [235638]
  6. Southern Pennsylvania Ben Franklin Energy Commercialization Institute [001389-002]
  7. US National Science Foundation Bridge [1026641]
  8. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  9. Division Of Human Resource Development [1026641] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Availability of grid-scale electric energy storage systems with response rates on the order of seconds plays a key role in wide implementation of renewable energy sources. Here, a new concept called the electrochemical flow capacitor (EFC) is presented. This new concept shares the major advantages of both supercapacitors and flow batteries, providing rapid charging/discharging while enabling the decoupling of the power and energy ratings. Like in supercapacitors, energy is stored in the electric double layer of charged carbon particles. A flowable carbon-electrolyte mixture is employed as the active material for capacitive energy storage, and is handled in a similar fashion to flow or semi-solid batteries (i.e., for charging/discharging, it is pumped into an electrochemical cell, and for storage, it is pumped into reservoirs). This study presents the proof-of-concept of this technology and reports initial EFC performance data obtained under static and intermittent flow operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据