4.8 Article

Photoelectrochemical Behavior of Planar and Microwire-Array Si|GaP Electrodes

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 9, 页码 1109-1116

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201100728

关键词

semiconductors; composites; electrodes; electro-optical materials

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Center for Chemical Innovation [CHE-0802907]
  2. DARPA
  3. NSF [CHE-1042006]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Chemistry [0802907] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Chemistry
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1042006] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gallium phosphide exhibits a short diffusion length relative to its optical absorption length, and is thus a candidate for use in wire array geometries that allow light absorption to be decoupled from minority carrier collection. Herein is reported the photoanodic performance of heteroepitaxially grown gallium phosphide on planar and microwire-array Si substrates. The n-GaP|n-Si heterojunction results in a favorable conduction band alignment for electron collection in the silicon. A conformal electrochemical contact to the outer GaP layer is produced using the ferrocenium/ferrocene (Fc+/Fc) redox couple in acetonitrile. Photovoltages of similar to 750 mV under 1 sun illumination are observed and are attributed to the barrier formed at the (Fc+/Fc)|n-GaP junction. The short-circuit current densities of the composite microwire-arrays are similar to those observed using single-crystal n-GaP photoelectrodes. Spectral response measurements along with a finite-difference-time-domain optical model indicate that the minority carrier diffusion length in the GaP is similar to 80 nm. Solid-state currentvoltage measurements show that shunting occurs through thin GaP layers that are present near the base of the microwire-arrays. The results provide guidance for further studies of 3D multi-junction photoelectrochemical cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据