4.8 Article

Spinel-Layered Core-Shell Cathode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 1, 期 5, 页码 821-828

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201100239

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010K000984]
  2. Ministry of Public Safety & Security (MPSS), Republic of Korea [C1090-1100-0002] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-50181] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an attempt to overcome the problems associated with LiNiO2, the solid solution series of lithium nickel-metal oxides, Li[Ni1-xMx]O-2 (with M = Co, Mn, Al, Ti, Mg, etc.), have been investigated as favorable cathode materials for high-energy and high-power lithium-ion batteries. However, along with the improvement in the electrochemical properties in Ni-based cathode materials, the thermal stability has been a great concern, and thus violent reaction of the cathode with the electrolyte needs to be avoided. Here, we report a heterostructured Li[Ni0.54Co0.12Mn0.34]O-2 cathode material which possesses both high energy and safety. The core of the particle is Li[Ni0.54Co0.12Mn0.34]O-2 with a layered phase (R3-m) and the shell, with a thickness of < 0.5 mu m, is a highly stable Li1+x[CoNixMn2-x](2)O-4 spinel phase (Fd-3m). The material demonstrates reversible capacity of 200 mAhg-1 and retains 95% capacity retention under the most severe test condition of 60 degrees C. In addition, the amount of oxygen evolution from the lattice in the cathode with two heterostructures is reduced by 70%, compared to the reference sample. All these results suggest that the bulk Li[Ni0.54Co0.12Mn0.34]O-2 consisting of two heterostructures satisfy the requirements for hybrid electric vehicles, power tools, and mobile electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据