4.8 Article

In Situ Stability Studies of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Ruthenium-Titanium Mixed Oxide (RTO) for Fuel Cell Cathodes

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 9675-9683

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02498

关键词

oxide-supported platinum nanoparticles; in situ X-ray studies; electrocatalysis; oxygen reduction reaction; polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyte fuel cell; strong metal-support interaction

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [STR 596/4-1]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03SF0531B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a variety of in situ techniques, we tracked the structural stability and concomitantly the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) of platinum nanoparticles on ruthenium-titanium mixed oxide (RTO) supports during electrochemical accelerated stress tests, mimicking fuel cell operating conditions. High-energy X-ray diffraction (HE-XRD) offered insights in the evolution of the morphology and structure of RTO-supported Pt nanoparticles during potential cycling. The changes of the atomic composition were tracked in situ using scanning flow cell measurements coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SFC-ICP-MS). We excluded Pt agglomeration, particle growth, dissolution, or detachment as cause for the observed losses in catalytic ORR. activity. Instead, we argue that Pt surface poisoning is the most likely cause of the observed catalytic rate decrease. Data suggest that the gradual growth of a thin oxide layer on the Pt nanoparticles due to strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) is the most plausible reason for the suppressed catalytic activity. We discuss the implications of the identified catalyst degradation pathway, which appear to be specific for oxide supports. Our conclusions offer previously unaddressed aspects related to oxide-supported metal particle electrocatalysts frequently deployed in fuel cells, electrolyzers, or metal-air batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据