4.8 Article

Electrocatalytic Enhancement of Salicylic Acid Oxidation at Electrochemically Reduced TiO2 Nanotubes

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 2616-2622

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cs500487a

关键词

electrocatalysis; TiO2 nanotubes; electrochemical treatment; salicylic acid; donor density; overpotential of oxygen evolution

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) for the Canada Research Chair Award in Materials & Environmental Chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, TiO2 nanotubes were treated via electrochemical reduction and tested as a novel catalyst, for the first time, toward the electrochemical oxidation of salicylic acid (SA), where the effects of cathodic current and reduction time were systemically investigated. The fabricated TiO2 nanotubes were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Cyclic voltammetry (CV), chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, ultraviolet visible light (UV-vis) absorbance spectroscopy, and Mott-Schottky plots were employed to study the enhanced electrochemical activity of the TiO2 nanotubes. Our experimental results revealed that the optimal electrochemical treatment conditions were -5 mA cm(-2) for 10 min. The treated TiO2 nanotubes possessed a much higher overpotential for oxygen evolution than a Pt electrode, and exhibited a high electrocatalytic activity SA. The oxidation of SA at the treated TiO2 nanotubes was shown to be 6.3 times greater than a Pt electrode. Stability tests indicated that treated TiO2 nanotubes are very stable over eight cycles of electrochemical oxidation of SA. The high electrocatalytic activity and stability of the treated TiO2 nanotubes enabled by the facile electrochemical reduction can be attributed to the decrease of Ti(IV), the increase of Ti(II) and Ti(III), and the increase of the oxygen vacancies, as well as significant improvement of the donor density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据