4.8 Article

Crystal Growth Kinetics as a Tool for Controlling the Catalytic Performance of a FAU-Type Basic Catalyst

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 4, 期 7, 页码 2333-2341

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cs500153e

关键词

FAU-type zeolite; basic catalysis; active sites accessibility; Knoevenagel condensation; framework basicity

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Yazaki Memorial Foundation of Science and Technology
  3. Micro Green project [ANR-12-IS08-0001-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports on the catalytic performance of nanosized zeolite X crystals and their precursors in the reaction of benzaldehyde with ethyl cyanoacetate. Crystal growth kinetics of FAU-type zeolite is studied at low temperature (35 degrees C) in order to discriminate different crystallization stages. First X-ray crystalline material is detected after 6 days of hydrothermal treatment. The formation of the crystalline phase is preceded by changes in the ring structure of an aluminosilicate precursor as revealed by the combined Raman-HEXRD-solid-state NMR analyses. The set of experimental data shows that these changes are related to the reorganization of the gel structure and the formation of zeolite units. Prior to the appearance of crystalline material, the apparently amorphous solid exhibits chemical composition and short-range order organization similar to that of a crystalline FAU-type zeolite. Knoevenagel condensation was used to test the catalytic activity of a series of zeolite intermediates and nanosized zeolite crystals. The amorphous precursor obtained after 5 days of hydrothermal treatment showed the highest yield of ethyl alpha-cyanocinnamate. Superior catalytic performance of this material was attributed to the combination of strong basic sites and less restricted and more accessible structure of the semicrystalline zeolite units. Thus, the crystal growth kinetics of FAU-type zeolite can be used as a tool to tune the properties of a catalyst used in Knoevenagel condensation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据