4.8 Article

Tafel Kinetics of Electrocatalytic Reactions: From Experiment to First-Principles

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 4364-4376

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/cs501312v

关键词

Tafel kinetics; electrocatalytic reactions; charge transfer coefficient; periodic continuum salvation method; first-principles calculations

资金

  1. NSFC [21173051, 21361130019, 21103110]
  2. 973 program [2011CB808500, 2013CB834603]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08DZ2270500]
  4. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [13YZ120]
  5. Chen Guang project by Shanghai Municipal Education Commission
  6. Shanghai Education Development Foundation, China
  7. Shanghai Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520040, 2013T60413, 12R21411200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Tafel equation is of fundamental importance in electrochemical kinetics, formulating a quantitative relation between the current and the applied electrochemical potential. The recent years have seen the rapid expansion and development in the application of first-principles density functional theory (DFT) simulation on electrocatalytic reactions that occur at the solid-liquid interface. This article reviews the current theoretical methods for electrochemistry modeling, in particular, those for the direct computation of Tafel kinetics of electrocatalytic reactions on surfaces based on DFT calculations. Representative reactions, namely, hydrogen evolution and oxygen evolution reactions, are selected to illustrate how the theoretical methods are applied to compute quantitatively the kinetics of multiple-step electrochemical reactions. We summarize in detail the computation procedure based on the first-principles periodic continuum solvation method for obtaining the charge transfer coefficient (CTC) and deducing the potential-dependent reaction rate. The theoretical results on the Tafel kinetics of electrochemical reactions are generalized and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据