4.8 Article

An antagonistic interaction between PlexinB2 and Rnd3 controls RhoA activity and cortical neuron migration

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4405

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) Studentship
  2. MRC Centenary Fellowship
  3. Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS) postdoctoral fellowship
  4. MRC Career Development Fellowship
  5. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  6. Wellcome Trust [086947/Z/08/Z]
  7. Medical Research Council [U117570528]
  8. BBSRC [BB/E004083/2]
  9. Wellcome Trust [086947/Z/08/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E004083/2, BB/E004083/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Cancer Research UK [15961] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Council [MC_U117570528] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. BBSRC [BB/E004083/2, BB/E004083/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. MRC [MC_U117570528] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A transcriptional programme initiated by the proneural factors Neurog2 and Ascl1 controls successive steps of neurogenesis in the embryonic cerebral cortex. Previous work has shown that proneural factors also confer a migratory behaviour to cortical neurons by inducing the expression of the small GTP-binding proteins such as Rnd2 and Rnd3. However, the directionality of radial migration suggests that migrating neurons also respond to extracellular signal-regulated pathways. Here we show that the Plexin B2 receptor interacts physically and functionally with Rnd3 and stimulates RhoA activity in migrating cortical neurons. Plexin B2 competes with p190RhoGAP for binding to Rnd3, thus blocking the Rnd3-mediated inhibition of RhoA and also recruits RhoGEFs to directly stimulate RhoA activity. Thus, an interaction between the cell-extrinsic Plexin signalling pathway and the cell-intrinsic Ascl1-Rnd3 pathway determines the level of RhoA activity appropriate for cortical neuron migration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据