4.8 Article

Unconventional molecule-resolved current rectification in diamondoid-fullerene hybrids

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5877

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division [DE-AC02-765F00515]
  2. US National Science Foundation [DMR-1206916]
  3. Karl van Bibber Fellowship
  4. NDSEG
  5. Communaute Francaise de Belgique [11/16-037, 09/14-023]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany) through DFG-NSF [CHE-0822112]
  7. Ministry of Science and Education of Ukraine
  8. Division Of Materials Research
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1206916] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unimolecular rectifier is a fundamental building block of molecular electronics. Rectification in single molecules can arise from electron transfer between molecular orbitals displaying asymmetric spatial charge distributions, akin to p-n junction diodes in semiconductors. Here we report a novel all-hydrocarbon molecular rectifier consisting of a diamantane-C-60 conjugate. By linking both sp(3) (diamondoid) and sp(2) (fullerene) carbon allotropes, this hybrid molecule opposingly pairs negative and positive electron affinities. The single-molecule conductances of self-assembled domains on Au(111), probed by low-temperature scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy, reveal a large rectifying response of the molecular constructs. This specific electronic behaviour is postulated to originate from the electrostatic repulsion of diamantane-C-60 molecules due to positively charged terminal hydrogen atoms on the diamondoid interacting with the top electrode (scanning tip) at various bias voltages. Density functional theory computations scrutinize the electronic and vibrational spectroscopic fingerprints of this unique molecular structure and corroborate the unconventional rectification mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据