4.8 Article

Ultrastructural relationship of the phagophore with surrounding organelles

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 439-451

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1017178

关键词

autophagy; electron tomography; Golgi complex; immunoEM; lysosome; mitochondrion; serial block face scanning electron microscopy; three dimensional; 3D; 3 dimensional; ATG; autophagy-related; BSA; bovine serum albumin; COPII; coat protein II; ER; endoplasmic reticulum; ET; electron tomography; GOLGA2; GM130; golgin A2; immunoEM; immuno electron microscopy; LAMP1; lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1; MAP1LC3; LC3; microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3; MCS; membrane contact site; PBS; phosphate-buffered saline; SB-EM; serial block-face scanning electron microscopy; SEC31A; SEC31 homolog A (S; cerevisiae); TFRC; transferrin receptor; WIPI2; WD repeat domain; phosphoinositide interacting 2

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Bio-center Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phagophore nucleates from a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) termed the omegasome and also makes contact with other organelles such as mitochondria, Golgi complex, plasma membrane and recycling endosomes during its formation. We have used serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SB-EM) and electron tomography (ET) to image phagophore biogenesis in 3 dimensions and to determine the relationship between the phagophore and surrounding organelles at high resolution. ET was performed to confirm whether membrane contact sites (MCSs) are evident between the phagophore and those surrounding organelles. In addition to the known contacts with the ER, we identified MCSs between the phagophore and membranes from putative ER exit sites, late endosomes or lysosomes, the Golgi complex and mitochondria. We also show that one phagophore can have simultaneous MCSs with more than one organelle. Future membrane flux experiments are needed to determine whether membrane contacts also signify lipid translocation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据