4.4 Article

Identification of RFC5 as a novel potential prognostic biomarker in lung cancer through bioinformatics analysis

期刊

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 4201-4210

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9221

关键词

replication factor C 5; lung cancer; prognosis; proliferation; bioinformatic analysis; biomarker

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81501352, 81270607, 81541027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortalities among all types of cancer. Therefore, the screening of biomarkers that are related with the progression of lung cancer is crucial for early diagnosis and efficient therapy of lung cancer. In the present study, bioinformatic analysis identified replication factor C 5 (RFC5) as a potential novel oncogene in lung cancer. RFC5 functions as a clamp loader and is involved in DNA replication and repair. Analysis of public databases and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction indicated that RFC5 was significantly increased in tumor tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues. A high RFC5 expression was observed to be associated with more aggressive malignant clinicopathological features, including higher T stage, more advanced regional lymph node metastasis and a higher probability of relapse. Notably, there were notable differences in overall survival (OS), first progression and post-progression survival between the high RFC5 expression group and low RFC5 expression group. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that RFC5 was an independent risk factor that was associated with poorer OS and disease-free survival. According to GSEA, several gene sets that are associated with cell cycle and DNA damage were enriched in the RFC5 overexpression group, which indicated that RFC5 might promote the proliferation of lung cancer cells. Our finding indicated that RFC5 might be a novel prognostic biomarker of lung cancer, and it might be serve as a potential diagnosis and therapy target for lung cancer in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据