4.4 Article

Predicting chemosensitivity in osteosarcoma prior to chemotherapy: An investigational study of biomarkers with immunohistochemistry

期刊

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
卷 3, 期 5, 页码 1011-1016

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.604

关键词

hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha; apurinic endonuclease-1; vascular endothelial growth factor; cycloogenase-2; osteosarcoma

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30900596]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteosarcoma has one of the worst prognoses in adolescents; only 20-60% of patients have high rates of histological necrosis with intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, we investigated the prognostic values of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha), apurinic endonuclease 1 (APED, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cycloogenase-2 (COX-2) protein expression and their predictive value of tumor necrosis rate and prognosis, as well as their interrelationships. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were obtained from 49 patients with osteosarcoma. Immunohistochemistry assays were performed in pre-chemotherapy samples to determine HIF-1 alpha, VEGF, APE1 and COX-2 protein expression levels and hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed in post-operative samples to determine the tumor necrosis rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the impact of protein expression on prognosis. HIF-1 alpha was significantly correlated with every protein we tested: VEGF (P=0.032), APE1 (P<0.001) and COX-2 (P<0.001). HIF-1 alpha protein expression had a significant impact on disease-free survival (P=0.006). Expression of HIF-1 alpha had a sensitivity of 64.7% and a specificity of 71.9% for a poor pathological response (<90% tumor necrosis) versus a good pathological response (>= 90% tumor necrosis). In conclusion, expression of HIF-1 alpha is a predictor of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome in osteosarcoma, and correlates with VEGF, APE1 and COX-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据