4.1 Article

Solid substrate bioassay to evaluate the effect of Trichoderma and Clonostachys on the production of zearalenone by Fusarium species

期刊

WORLD MYCOTOXIN JOURNAL
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 45-52

出版社

WAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3920/WMJ2008.x046

关键词

biocontrol; Fusarium; zearalenone; Trichoderma; Clonostachys

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [PBZ-KBN-112/P06/2005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fusarium head blight and maize ear rot are destructive diseases in various cereal production regions, leading to significant yield losses and to the contamination of cereal grain with Fusarium mycotoxins. The mycotoxin zearalenone belongs to the three most important mycotoxins produced by Fusarium species worldwide; moreover, its hormonal oestrogenic activity is higher than its toxicity. The compound also exhibits fungitoxic activity. Toxigenic Fusarium species sporulate on cereal crop residues and produce inoculum to infect the next crop. Reduction of mycotoxin production and pathogen sporulation may be influenced by saprophytic fungal antagonists. Selected Trichoderma and Clonostachys isolates in dual culture bioassays on rice reduced zearalenone, alpha-zearalenol and zearalenone sulphate production by two isolates of Fusarium graminearum Schwabe and two isolates of F. culmorum (W.G. Smith) Saccardo belonging to three different chemotypes, by over 97%. Two Trichoderma isolates reduced the amount of zearalenone produced by the same four Fusarium isolates by 5-83% in solid substrate bioassays, whereas several Clonostachys isolates reduced the amount of zearalenone by over 96%. Examination of the dynamics of zearalenone reduction showed that the reduction occurred at the fastest rate during the first four days of incubation. Selected non-toxigenic Trichoderma and Clonostachys isolates are candidates for biocontrol agents against toxigenic Fusarium pathogens of cereals and may be useful for decomposition of zearalenone in contaminated cereal grain and cereal products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据