4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): Comparison with immediate transfusion following massive hemorrhage in swine

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
卷 79, 期 6, 页码 930-936

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000877

关键词

Swine; shock; hemorrhagic; aorta; endovascular procedures

资金

  1. Telemedicine and Advanced Technologies Research Center, Fort Detrick, MD
  2. Pryor Medical
  3. Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, WA
  4. US Department of Energy
  5. US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is less invasive than emergency department thoracotomy for the treatment of massive hemorrhage. We evaluated the effects of REBOA on carotid blood flow (Q(carotid)) in a porcine model of massive hemorrhage. We hypothesized that REBOA restores Q(carotid) faster than reinfusion of blood. METHODS Spontaneously breathing sedated Sinclair pigs underwent exponential hemorrhage of 65% total blood volume in 1 hour. They were randomized into three groups. Positive control (PC, n = 7) underwent immediate transfusion of shed blood. REBOA (n = 21) received a novel 7 Fr ER-REBOA catheter (Pryor Medical, Arvada, CO) placed into aortic Zone 1 via a femoral artery introducer for 30 minutes or 60 minutes, with transfusion either after deflation or midway through inflation. Negative control (n = 7) received no resuscitation. Q(carotid) was recorded continuously using an ultrasonic flow probe. Survival and time between Q(carotid, min) and both a stable maximal value (Q(carotid, max)) and restoration of baseline flow (Q(carotid, new BL)) were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS Median time to Q(carotid, max) was 3.0 minutes in the REBOA group versus 9.6 minutes in the control group (p = 0.006). Median time to Q(carotid, new BL) was 6.0 minutes in the REBOA group versus 20.5 minutes in the PC group (p = 0.11). Slope of the linear regression between Q(carotid, min) and Q(carotid, new BL) was 16.7 in REBOA and 10.4 in PC (p = 0.31). Four-hour survival was 95% (20 of 21) in the REBOA group versus 71% (5 of 7) in the PC group (p = 0.06) and 0% in the negative control group. CONCLUSION REBOA resulted in the restoration of Q(carotid) (cerebrovascular resuscitation) at least as rapidly as retransfusion of shed blood, with equivalent 4-hour survival. Further studies of REBOA, to include mitigation of end-organ effects and longer follow-up, are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据