4.3 Article

Generation of bivalent chromatin domains during cell fate decisions

期刊

EPIGENETICS & CHROMATIN
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/1756-8935-4-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre
  2. MRC [MC_U137973817, MC_EX_G0701347, MC_U137961147] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U137961147, G1000801c, G1000801b, MC_U137973817, G1000801j, MC_EX_G0701347] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In self-renewing, pluripotent cells, bivalent chromatin modification is thought to silence (H3K27me3) lineage control genes while 'poising' (H3K4me3) them for subsequent activation during differentiation, implying an important role for epigenetic modification in directing cell fate decisions. However, rather than representing an equivalently balanced epigenetic mark, the patterns and levels of histone modifications at bivalent genes can vary widely and the criteria for identifying this chromatin signature are poorly defined. Results: Here, we initially show how chromatin status alters during lineage commitment and differentiation at a single well characterised bivalent locus. In addition we have determined how chromatin modifications at this locus change with gene expression in both ensemble and single cell analyses. We also show, on a global scale, how mRNA expression may be reflected in the ratio of H3K4me3/H3K27me3. Conclusions: While truly 'poised' bivalently modified genes may exist, the original hypothesis that all bivalent genes are epigenetically premarked for subsequent expression might be oversimplistic. In fact, from the data presented in the present work, it is equally possible that many genes that appear to be bivalent in pluripotent and multipotent cells may simply be stochastically expressed at low levels in the process of multilineage priming. Although both situations could be considered to be forms of 'poising', the underlying mechanisms and the associated implications are clearly different.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据