4.5 Article

State of Bond along Lap Splices

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
卷 141, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001243

关键词

Lap-splices; Bond distribution; Crack width; Crack spacing; Crack stabilization; Analysis and computation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Design requirements for development length of lap-spliced reinforcing bars in concrete refer to the associated rules for anchorage, practically treating the two problems as one. This was based on the empirical observation that development capacity of reinforcement obtained from both lap-splice and anchorage tests converge to the same experimental values. Nevertheless, from a theoretical viewpoint the similarity between the states of stress of these two problems is not well addressed. In order to trace the underlying relationship between these two bond conditions, the field equations governing lap-splice behavior are established and solved from first principles using simplified constitutive relationships for steel and bond between reinforcement and concrete; the state of stress thus estimated is subsequently compared with the state of stress that occurs along an anchorage of the same length. Because lap splices occur in the clear span of members in the presence of flexural moment, an essential point in the solution of the differential equations of bond is the onset of crack stabilization in the splice region. Both longitudinal and transverse concrete cover cracking is considered in solving for the associated bond stress distribution, whereas debonding that initiates at the lap ends and spreads inward to cross inner flexural cracks is reproduced in the solution. Model verification is based on comparisons with indicatively selected published data from elastic lap-splice tests. The main conclusion derived from the model is the confirmation of the empirical rule embedded in the Code Design procedures, namely that bond in lap-splice regions behaves exactly the same as in the anchorage. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据