4.4 Article

Analysis of Gender Differences in Knowledge of Stroke Warning Signs

期刊

JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 1540-1547

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.03.017

关键词

Stroke; gender; gender differences; knowledge diffusion; women and minorities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The impact of gender on knowledge of stroke warning signs and preparedness is poorly understood, and gender-specific factors associated with poor knowledge of stroke warning signs have not been identified. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 132,604 participants in the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey, a national telephone survey. Adults aged 18 years or older who lived in one of 19 states that administered an optional stroke module asking them to correctly identify stroke symptoms and the correct action to take were included. The primary outcome was a low score (<= 4 of 7) on the Stroke Symptoms Knowledge Scale (SSKS). Logistic regression was performed for the overall sample and then stratified by gender, with adjustments made for age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, income, and whether respondents had a primary doctor (PMD). Data were weighted as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control. Results: In all, 51.7% of the weighted sample was women. Less women than men had low scores on the SSKS (21% versus 25%, P < .001). After adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, income, and PMD, men had higher odds of having low scores (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.45). After stratifying by gender, Hispanic ethnicity, and age younger than 35 years predicted low scores on the scale in women but not in men. Conclusions: Female gender is associated with better knowledge of stroke warning signs, but a gender-specific approach identified Hispanic women, young women, and black participants as subgroups at risk for having poor knowledge, suggesting the need for targeted stroke education to increase stroke preparedness in these groups. (C) 2015 by National Stroke Association

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据