4.7 Article

Nerve growth factor-mediated inhibition of apoptosis post-caspase activation is due to removal of active caspase-3 in a lysosome-dependent manner

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2014.173

关键词

apoptosis; autophagy; caspases; lysosomes; nerve growth factor (NGF)

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [09/RFP/BMT2153]
  2. Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology (EMBARK scholarships)
  3. Breast Cancer Campaign, UK [2008NovPhD21]
  4. Thomas Crawford Hayes fund, School of Natural Sciences, NUI Galway, Ireland
  5. Beckman fund, School of Natural Sciences, NUI Galway, Ireland
  6. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [09/RFP/BMT2153] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is well characterised as an important pro-survival factor in neuronal cells that can inhibit apoptotic cell death upstream of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation. Here we addressed the question of whether NGF can also protect against apoptosis downstream of caspase activation. NGF treatment promoted a rapid reduction in the level of the p17 subunit of active caspase-3 in PC12 cells that had been induced to undergo apoptosis by various cytotoxins. The mechanism involved TrkA-dependent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) but not phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, and de novo protein synthesis. Involvement of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) and proteasomal degradation were ruled out. In contrast, inhibition of lysosome function using chloroquine and concanamycin A reversed NGF-induced removal of p17. Moreover, in NGF-treated cells, active caspases were found to be localised to lysosomes. The involvement of macroautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy were ruled out. Taken together, these findings suggest an anti-apoptotic mechanism by which NGF induces removal of active caspase-3 in a lysosome-dependent manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据