3.8 Review

Information Technology to Support Self-Management in Chronic Care A Systematic Review

期刊

DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 391-401

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.2165/0115677-200816060-00004

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Informed individuals who are actively engaged in managing the daily challenges of their chronic disease are the change agents in a healthcare system that is presently unresponsive to the needs of this growing population. The application of information technology (IT) to support self-management extends the reach of the provider organization by linking patients to the exchange of health information and facilitating self-management activities. This systematic review of the literature was conducted to illuminate the application of IT that is enabling consumer self-management and healthcare provider support of that self-management. Research in self-management IT is being conducted to determine the effectiveness of various tools in improving self-management performance and health outcomes. A significant area of inquiry focuses on self-managernent technologies to support the chronic care model (CCM) conceived by Wagner and colleagues. Results indicate that most research is focused on the use of IT by individuals for self-education and self-monitoring, with a small number of studies exploring applications to enable collaboration of providers and individuals in self-management planning and activities. Changes in patient adherence and levels of knowledge were the most popular outcome variables measured, with reports of significant improvements in both areas. However, limitations in study design have led to inconclusive results regarding the effect of IT-based self-management tools on patient adherence and clinical outcomes. This systematic review affirms the importance of extending the IT infrastructure of the healthcare system to support the self-management activities of individuals striving to manage their chronic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据