4.3 Article

Interspecific hybridization between Crassostrea angulata and C-ariakensis

期刊

JOURNAL OF OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 710-716

出版社

OCEAN UNIV CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s11802-015-2546-8

关键词

Crassostrea angulata; Crassostrea ariakensis; interspecific hybridization; gonad development; heterosis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31172403]
  2. National Key Basic Research Development Planning Project [2010CB126406]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interspecific hybridization can generate heterosis, which is proven to be a useful tool in selective breeding programs for oyster culture. Crassostrea angulata and C. ariakensis are two important economic shellfish species in China. We conducted 2 x 2 reciprocal crosses to determine whether these two species can cross-fertilize and their hybrids can hatch, survive and perform heterosis. Fertilization was found symmetrical without delay. The rate of fertilization success of C. angulata a (TM) Euro x C. ariakensis a (TM), was lower than that of C. ariakensis a (TM) Euro x C. angulata a (TM),, and the success rate of both hybridizations was lower than that of two intraspecific crosses each. During the planktonic period, survival rate of the progeny was lower in the hybrid crosses than in the intraspecific crosses. On day 360, mean shell height of the progeny of C. angulata a (TM) Euro x C. angulata a (TM), was highest, which was followed by that of C. angulata a (TM) Euro x C. ariakensis a (TM),, C. ariakensis a (TM) Euro x C. ariakensis a (TM), and C. ariakensis a (TM) Euro x C. angulata a (TM), in a descending order. Morphology of adults produced by the hybrid crosses was similar to that of C. angulata. Both hybrids underwent normal gonad development and produced mature gametes in the mating season. This study provided new insights into the quantitative traits in interspecific crosses of Crassostrea species, thus being of guidance value for selective breeding of oyster.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据