Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the impact of a standardized pathological protocol on resection margin status after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for ductal adenocarcinoma. MethodsA total of 150 patients operated during 2008-2010 were included in a prospective multicentre study using a quality protocol'. Multicolour inking by the surgeon identified three resection margins: the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein margin (PV-SMVm) or mesenterico-portal vein groove; the superior mesenteric artery margin (SMAm), and the posterior margin. Resection margins were stratified by 0.5-mm increments (range: 0-2.0mm). Pancreatic neck, bile duct and intestinal margins were also analysed. Correlations between histopathological factors and survival in the 0-mm resection margin group were analysed. ResultsThirty-six patients (24%) had a PV-SMV resection (PV-SMVR). An analysis of resections categorized according to margin distances of 0mm, <1.0mm, <1.5mm and <2.0mm confirmed R1 resections in 35 (23%), 91 (61%), 94 (63%) and 107 (71%) patients, respectively. The most frequently invaded resection margin was the PV-SMVm (35% of all patients) and PV-SMVR was the only factor correlated with a higher risk for at least one 0-mm positive resection margin on multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and median PFS time in patients with R0 and R1 resections (at 0mm), respectively, were 42.0% and 26.5%, and 19.5 months and 10.5 months, respectively (P = 0.02). A positive PV-SMVm and SMAm had significant impact on PFS, whereas a positive posterior margin had no impact. ConclusionsPancreaticoduodenectomy requiring PV-SMVR was associated with a higher risk for R1 resection. The standardization of histopathological analysis has a clinically relevant impact on PFS data.