4.4 Article

Major Ion Chemistry of Shallow Groundwater in the Dongsheng Coalfield, Ordos Basin, China

期刊

MINE WATER AND THE ENVIRONMENT
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 195-206

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10230-013-0234-8

关键词

Hydrogeology; Hydrogeochemistry; Water-rock interaction; Water quality

资金

  1. Doctor Postgraduate Technical Project of Chang'an University [CHD2011 ZY025, CHD2011ZY022]
  2. Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges [CHD2011ZY020, CHD2011TD 003]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41172212, 51009009, 41130753]
  4. special Funds for Scientific Research on Public Interest of the Ministry of Water Resources [201301084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hydrogeochemical study was conducted in the Dongsheng Coalfield, Ordos Basin, China, to identify the mechanisms responsible for the chemical compositions of the shallow groundwater and to document water quality with respect to agricultural and drinking supply standards, prior to mining. Tri-linear diagrams, principal component analysis, and correlation analysis were used to reveal the hydrogeochemical characteristics of the shallow groundwater, and the potential water-rock interactions. In general, the major cations and anions were present at low concentrations, but were relatively higher around Jiushenggong than elsewhere in the study area. Groundwater around Jiushenggong has a long residence time and is also subject to extensive evapotranspiration. The dominant hydrochemical facies are HCO3-Ca, HCO3-Na, and mixed HCO3-Ca center dot Na center dot Mg types. Increases in major ion concentrations along the flow path, including Na, Cl, and SO4, coincide with increases in total dissolved solids. The predominant mechanism controlling groundwater chemistry proved to be the dissolution of carbonates, gypsum, and halite. Cation exchange and mixing with local recharge water are also important factors. The shallow groundwater quality in the study area is suitable for agricultural and drinking purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据