4.7 Article

Involvement of nitric oxide and prostacyclin in the antihypertensive effect of low-molecular-weight procyanidin rich grape seed extract in male spontaneously hypertensive rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 419-427

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.11.008

关键词

Grape seed procyanidin extract; Nitric oxide; Polyphenols; Prostacyclin; Spontaneously hypertensive rats

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of the Spanish Government [AGL 2008-00387/ALI]
  2. Universitat Rovira i Virgili-Banco Santander [2011 LINE-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the involvement of endothelial-relaxing factors as possible antihypertensive mechanism of low-molecular-weight procyanidin rich grape seed extract (LM-GSPE). Thirty 17-20-week-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were administered water or 375 mg/kg LM-GSPE by intragastric gavage. One millilitre of saline, 30 mg/kg NG-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) or 5 mg/kg indomethacin was administrated intraperitoneally. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded before and 6 h after oral administration. Plasma concentration of 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha (PGF1 alpha) was quantified. In addition, we evaluated the relaxation caused by LM-GSPE in different aorta preparations. The antihypertensive effect of LM-GSPE was completely and partially abolished by L-NAME and indomethacin, respectively. In addition, plasma PGF1 alpha was increased in LM-GSPE-administered rats. Finally, LM-GSPE relaxed the intact aorta preparations but did not relax the endothelium-denuded aorta rings. L-NAME inhibited the relaxation caused by LM-GSPE in the SHR aorta rings, but indomethacin did not. Therefore, the antihypertensive effect of LM-GSPE in SHR is endothelium dependent, and it could be mediated by changes in endothelium-derived nitric oxide bioavailability. Nevertheless, prostacyclin could also contribute additionally to this effect. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据