4.7 Article

Identification of flavonoids in litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) leaf and evaluation of anticancer activities

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 555-563

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.11.022

关键词

Purification; Flavonoid; Cytotoxity; NMR; Litchi leaf

资金

  1. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [S2013050014131]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Pearl River Science and Technology New Star Fund of Guangzhou
  4. International Foundation for Science [F/4451-2]
  5. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2011020001156]
  6. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2011A020102006]
  7. Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303073]
  8. National Natural Science Foundation of China [3110122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six flavonoids, namely luteolin (1), epicatechin (2), kaempferol 3-O-beta-glucoside (3), kaempferol 3-O-alpha-rhamnoside (4), procyanidin A(2) (5) and rutin (6) were purified from the EtOAc-soluble extract of litchi leaf by column chromatography. Their structures were elucidated by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) evidences. Luteolin and kaempferol 3-O-alpha-rhamnoside were found from this plant for the first time. Procyanidin A(2) exhibited high anticancer activities against human hepatoma HepG2 and human cervical carcinoma Hela cells. However, it had poor anticancer activities against human lung cancer A549 and human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Luteolin, epicatechin, procyanidin A(2) and rutin showed good antioxidant activities than butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). The antimicrobial activity assay indicated that luteolin possessed the strongest antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Shigella dysenteriae, Salmonella and Bacillus thuringiensis. Epicatechin, procyanidin A(2) and rutin showed relatively weak antimicrobial activities. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据