4.7 Article

Myricitrin attenuates 6-hydroxydopamine-induced mitochondrial damage and apoptosis in PC12 cells via inhibition of mitochondrial oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 337-345

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2012.11.004

关键词

Myricitrin; Lipid peroxidation; Mitochondria; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Young Foundation in CAMS PUMC
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2012ZX09103101-078]
  3. research special fund for public welfare industry of health [200902008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons at the substantia nigra. 6-Hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) is a dopamine analog, which specifically to damage dopaminergic neurons. Myricitrin, a flavanoid isolated from the root bark of Myrica cerifera, has antinociceptive activity, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties. In the present study, the potential protection and mechanism of myricitrin against 6-OHDA-induced damage and apoptosis in PC12 cells was studied. The results showed that myricitrin attenuated 6-OHDA-induced cell damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in a dose-dependent manner, which was correlated with decreased intracellular ATP content and mitochondrial membrane potential. Furthermore, it was found that myricitrin inhibited the apoptosis of PC12 cells induced by 6-OHDA in relation to reduction of cytochrome C release from mitochondria and inhibition of the activity of caspase-3. Finally, the antioxidation of myricitrin in PC12 cells and brain mitochondria was investigated. The results showed that myricitrin decreased the production of reactive oxygen species in PC12 cells and inhibited lipid peroxidation in rat brain mitochondria (IC50 = 3.19 +/- 0.34 mu M). Thus, myricitrin has the neuroprotective capacity to antagonize 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells and may be useful in treating PD. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据